Instinct (After “Melanchthon”) What prevents man, individually and collectively, from behaving reasonably and morally is not so much ignorance as a self-blindness induced by some passion or desire. (W.H. Auden, The Dyer’s Hand) Thinking, granted, but less like a mind, more like an eager dog in search of a worn-out bone. These things comfort me: in my corner of the garden, familiar, it gives safety, blanket- like, tattered and torn, yet homely in its weathered wear. The mind glimpses, encompasses these things which Bentham sees from his prison tower and knows; surveillance gives the impulse, but instinct the reason. And so a dog returns to its own refuse and Jonah hides for days inside his whale; and I too need corners and familiar scents. Why I am what I am, I do not know. The dog has its goals and its purposes, so too the mole which, though blind, is quicker than the human mind’s quickest percep- tion. Yet we move by more than mere impulse, by brain-waves which fly and flit before we hear them. Reflexes have no accompanying, conscious thought yet some things are learnt and made reflex that should be conscious. “Adam, who told you that you were naked?” No need to teach him to hide his shame in leaves once the brain already knew, “Eat apple”. Automated and unthinking disobedience is the hardest to overcome; and we are cursed (blessed?) with the knowledge that instinct, though enchanting, is not enough, blessed (cursed?) with eyes to see both the apple and the consequence. If blind, we are wiser than our blindness knows, yet too blind to know it. The dog, the mole, defy us, yet we are called to more. “Naked, man, the self”: what’s been bestowed on him, on us, declares we cannot plead ignorance. Man – the height, though helpless before the creatures that preceded him – must bow and rule, burrow and build, obey and reason, trust and know, be blind and see. What calling, what heights beside what depths! What impulse and what instinct, what knowledge planted through that first breath, knowing all the blindness yet breathing still.
Creation
Creation not ex nihilo, for all matter is that shall be and cannot be created or destroyed, only re-organised, reshuffled, like pieces in a shifting puzzle, or the notes within the stave, position altered to make sounds majestic like the breath of dawn upon dry ribs, the tune of rising life, of fluctuating spirit, working in the scheme already fixed, yet shifting. But what privilege to plant seed and see it grow, to see these atoms move, rearrange in ever-changing harmony! As though the Maker of these things, had set within unchanging self the wish to see our hands participate in the turning of this soil, this mixing of colour, of sound, as though His father’s wish was to share beauty’s growth and to make it grow through us.
Rudd and Bonhoeffer: A Verse Comparison
A conversation with my girlfriend after the recent Australian election prompted her to suggest that I might write a poem about my disappointment with Kevin Rudd, a man who in the past has professed a Christian approach to politics that I have identified with. It isn’t exactly nuanced political commentary, but it was therapeutic to write!
Rudd and Bonhoeffer
Dietrich Bonhoeffer died for his beliefs;
KRudd’s beliefs slowly died –
In good conscience, he said,
Though I don’t think he’s read
The books he should use as his guide.
For Bonhoeffer knew discipleship’s cost,
But Kevin 07 seems lost,
Taking selfies of shaving cuts
(We wish his mouth was shut) –
Not quite the cost of the Cross.
So all of this, then, is to say,
The Christian left has lost its way
If Rudd was our mascot.
I don’t think that we have got
Much of a cause to our name.
“For he taught them as one who had authority”
The fox knows many things,
but the hedgehog knows one big thing.
(Archilochus)
The authority of the fox runs in many directions;
centrifugal, it leaves
the burrow with cunning,
while the hedgehog burrows centripetally,
knowing one thing
and knowing it
deep.
And the scribes and the Pharisees, burrowing law,
are amazed to see
one who leaves
the centre and the limelight to go elsewhere,
to sheep of other folds
and to walk upon the
seas.
The demons know who He is, for they know the depths,
but not the heights
or the width;
they burrow into souls and feed upon duplexity,
robbing the double-minded
of heart and wealth
within,
while scribes and Pharisees declare that this is so:
a vision planted once
in truth, yet with no
power to make it so, fed only on tenacity,
a stubborn clinging to
the way it’s always
been.
But now a teacher stands who sees the motions of the seas,
and in His voice
are manifold
truths that spoke the stars to be, and turns the shrivelled
joints and bones
to wholeness; many,
one –
He holds both in His depth and breadth, for, one with
Father, Spirit,
grasps the whole
yet sees the many parts – a fox, a hedgehog,
knowing both
one and many
things,
the cunning of the fox who knows and sees complexity,
who, being God, has
complex core,
yet pure in heart, single in vision: the Kingdom,
with its manifold glory
and unity in this
richness.
“The invisible things of him”
Well, it’s hard to believe, but this is apparently my 500th post here at The Consolations of Writing. It’s been quite an amazing couple of years since I set up this site, and I’m very grateful to have wonderful readers to share it with.
Today’s poem comes out of a Bible study that I am leading tonight on Romans. In my attempt to understand it, I’ve looked back to Genesis, a place which Marianne Moore’s poetry has already taken me to this month. I have found it comforting and helpful to go back to the beginnings of God’s story and to see in that moment the way that the big picture of salvation slowly unfolds out of our weakness and failure.
“The invisible things of him from the creation of the world”
Fruit glistened in the garden with the rising of the mist, and all was golden, fresh-green, hopeful in its naked, shameless days. There wisdom grew its faithful flowers and put seeds in fruit, the Tree of Life’s triumphant bough an arch, a bow across us; what knowledge that we needed, we found in hand-in-hand walking, truth of trees and seasons, flowers’ names, the songs of hours. And what was seen in the sky, what walked amongst us on the garden’s paths, we knew as truth, sufficient unto the day: a righteousness revealed in days ordered and perfect like each one before, and worship-choirs heard on these breezy nights; a righteous trust that held the hand of its Father-Maker in the garden of its making, where nothing else need rule. Still, fruit glistened in the garden with the rising of our dreams, thoughts that burned like snake-bites in our wisdom-longing minds, where what was seen, invisible – though all that we need know – was not enough for our yearning throats that surely would not die.Adam’s Hymn
It shouldn’t be a surprise to any of my regular readers that I love the hymns of John Newton and William Cowper. Some of you will also know that, for the last eighteen or so months I have been working through a number of their hymns, setting them to new tunes of my own. Tonight I finally got around to recording the first of the hymns that I set to music, one which Newton simply entitled “Adam”. It is a powerful retelling of Adam’s fall, told from the perspective of the Gospel. You’ll have to forgive the technical shoddiness of the recording, but I hope that it can help to open new audiences up to the beauty of Newton’s words.
Of the People (After Marianne Moore’s “In Distrust of Merits”)
Doggerel for the Federal Election in the Seat of Melbourne
Adam Bandt
Shook my hand
Quite a hand
Had Adam Bandt
If I had
Not have planned
How to vote, then Adam Bandt
Would have won me with his hand
(What a hand
Had Adam Bandt).
Cath Bowtell’s
Quite nice as well
She smiled at all
And offered help
But she did not shake my hand –
For shaking hands
See Adam Bandt.
At the First Dawn of Brightness (After Marianne Moore’s “In the Days of Prismatic Colour”)
Marianne Moore is both an intriguing and a daunting poet to imitate. Her poems, visually and linguistically, dance in complexity and variety, and her subject matter is often both fascinating and impenetrable. Today’s poem is based on “In the Days of Prismatic Colour“, a wonderful meditation on Creation, complexity and simplicity. I offer it tentatively, but happy to have survived the challenge.
At the First Dawn of Brightness (After "In the Days of Prismatic Colour") when seasons and order were only yet imagined, impressions in the Creator's mind, the spirit hovered over waters deep, the plan a temple in His heart, a stool for feet to rest beneath Heaven's radiance; the light of first-dawn being, time and space instantly conceived, and domes there waiting for division, no ribs yet and no apples there for eating; and colour hummed at first acquaintance with the light, its purpose soon to be unveiled: water blue like baby's clothing, Heaven thick, its door ajar, the light from it refracting over domes and oceans and the parting of ideas, and celebrations declared when the lights, large and small, appeared in the sky, marking out our days and giving rhythm, pace and tone, while colour grew in the teeming oceans and over Leviathan on his frolicking back, the texture of water atop the scales of skin and flesh, each according to its various kinds: this was the season declared by the first dawn of brightness, when shade was a new language and nothing was known but the days given order and purpose within every breath of soft life, when our wisdom had not learned to eat its own fruit, and spring was silent punctuation. There colour hovered, potential unrealised but tranquil: a tone, a hand, a promise that when white was spoiled, there would be other words, like red, on hand, and spectrum-bows in place of floods.
12 Poets #6: Marianne Moore
It’s hard to believe, but another month has passed and it’s time for a new poet. We are now into the 20th century, and our poet for September is the brilliant and eccentric American modernist poet Marianne Moore. One of the most accomplished and celebrated poets of her century, Moore was also a devout Presbyterian, a fact which does not immediately show itself in her work but which we shall try to look at more closely as the month unfolds. She will be a challenging poet to work with, for the complexity of her style, but also a delight. I’m looking forward to sharing her work and my responses to it with you all.
